perlbug - how to submit bug reports on Perl
perlbug [ -v ] [ -a address ] [ -s subject ]
[ -b body | -f inputfile ] [ -F outputfile ]
[ -r returnaddress ] [ -e editor ]
[ -c adminaddress | -C ] [ -S ] [ -t ] [ -d ] [ -h ]
perlbug [ -v ] [ -r returnaddress ]
[ -ok | -okay | -nok | -nokay ]
A program to help generate bug reports about perl or the modules that come with it, and mail them.
If you have found a bug with a non-standard port (one that was not part of the standard distribution), a binary distribution, or a non-standard module (such as Tk, and CGI), please see the documentation that came with that distribution to determine the correct place to report bugs.
The perlbug(1) utility is designed to be used interactively. Normally no arguments will be needed. Simply run it and follow the prompts.
If you are unable to run perlbug(1) (most likely because you do not have a working setup to send mail that perlbug(1) recognizes), you might have to compose your own report, and email it to perlbug@perl.com. In such a case, you might find the -d option useful to get summary information.
Whenever reporting a bug, please include answers to the following questions:
To determine this, go to the Perl Web site at http://www.perl.com. If you are not running the most recently released version, get the most recent version and determine whether your bug has been fixed. Note that bug reports about old versions of perl, especially those prior to the 5.0 release, are likely to fall upon deaf ears. You are on your own if you continue to use perl1 .. perl4.
Be aware of the familiar traps that perl programmers of various hues fall into. See perltrap.
Check in perldiag to see what any perl error message means. If the message is not in perldiag, it probably is not generated by perl, and you should consult your operating system documentation.
If you are on a non-UNIX platform check also the perlport; some features might not be implemented or might work differently.
Try to study the problem under the perl debugger, if necessary. See perldebug.
A good test case is almost always a good candidate to be on the perl test suite. If you have the time, consider making your test case so that it will readily fit into the standard test suite.
Remember to include the exact error messages, if any. "Perl complained something" is not an exact error message.
If you get a core dump (or equivalent), you can use a debugger (such as dbx or gdb) to produce a stack trace to include in the bug report. NOTE: unless your Perl has been compiled with debug info (often -g), the stack trace is likely to be somewhat difficult to use because it will probably contain only the function names, not their arguments. If possible, recompile your Perl with debug info and reproduce the dump and the stack trace.
The easier it is to understand a reproducible bug, the more likely it will be fixed. Anything you can provide by way of insight into the problem helps a great deal. In other words, try to analyze the problem to the extent you feel qualified and report your discoveries.
Here are some clues for creating quality patches: Use the -c or -u switches to the diff program (to create aso-called context or unified diff). Make sure the patch is not reversed (the first argument to diff is typically the original file, the second argument your changed file). Make sure you test your patch by applying it with the patch program before you send it on its way. Try to follow the same style as the code you are trying to patch. Make sure your patch really does work (make test, if the thing you're patching supports it).
perlbug(1) will ensure your report includes crucial information about your version of perl. If perlbug(1) is unable to mail your report after you have typed it in, you might have to compose the message yourself, add the output produced by perlbug -d and email it to perlbug@perl.com. If, for some reason, you cannot run perlbug at all on your system, be sure to include the entire output produced by running perl -V (note the uppercase V).
Whether you use perlbug(1) or send the email manually, please make your subject informative. Comments like "a bug" are not informative. Neither are "perl crashes" or "HELP!!!," these all are null information. A compact description of what is wrong is fine.
Having done your bit, please be prepared to wait, to be told the bug is in your code, or even to get no reply at all. The perl maintainers are busy folks, so if your problem is a small one or if it is difficult to understand or already known, they might not respond with a personal reply. If it is important to you that your bug be fixed, monitor the "Changes" file in any development releases that have occurred since the time you submitted the bug, and encourage the maintainers with kind words (but never any flames!). Feel free to resend your bug report if the next released version of perl comes out and your bug is still present.
Kenneth Albanowski. Subsequently doctored by Gurusamy Sarathy, Tom Christiansen, Nathan Torkington, Charles F. Randall, Mike Guy, Dominic Dunlop, Hugo van der Sanden, and Jarkko Hietaniemi.
perl(1)
diff(1)
patch(1)
gdb(1)